| Title |
Medication-related harm in New Zealand general practice: a retrospective records review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Leitch, Susan M Dovey, Wayne K Cunningham, Alesha J Smith, Jiaxu Zeng, David M Reith, Katharine A Wallis, Kyle S Eggleton, Andrew W McMenamin, Martyn I Williamson, Steven Lillis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 17% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#784,174
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#340
of 4,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,019
of 432,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.