↓ Skip to main content

Exemplary medical care or Trojan horse? An analysis of the ‘lifestyle medicine’ movement

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
133 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Exemplary medical care or Trojan horse? An analysis of the ‘lifestyle medicine’ movement
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgp21x715721
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Nunan, David N Blane, Margaret McCartney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#291,534
of 17,948,621 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#114
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,375
of 302,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,948,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.