↓ Skip to main content

Don’t get fooled again

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Don’t get fooled again
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgp21x716297
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Misselbrook

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 33%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#972,025
of 21,550,416 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#479
of 4,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,972
of 342,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,550,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.