Title |
Recommendations for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of long covid: A Delphi study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0265 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martine Nurek, Clare Rayner, Anette Freyer, Sharon Taylor, Linn Järte, Nathalie MacDermott, Brendan C Delaney, on behalf of the Delphi panellists, Nisreen Alwan, Emily Attree, Jennifer Blair, Mary-Ann Bowen, Nicola J Brobbel, Ciara Burgess, Michael Cannell, Christopher Dixon, Nell Freeman-Romilly, Sonali Gaur, Thea Haldane, Melissa Heightman, Theresa Howe, Parul Kalia, Ramzi Khamis, Muhammed Asad Khan, Emma Ladds, Amali Lokugamage, Harsha Master, Rebecca Macfarlane, Anna Paes, Sonia Parmar, Elizabeth Potter, Manoj Sivan, Sarah May Taylor, Margarita Thomson, Avril Washington, Katherine Wildon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 396 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 98 | 25% |
United States | 30 | 8% |
France | 15 | 4% |
Australia | 10 | 3% |
Germany | 8 | 2% |
Canada | 6 | 2% |
Japan | 6 | 2% |
Ireland | 5 | 1% |
Sweden | 4 | 1% |
Other | 27 | 7% |
Unknown | 187 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 302 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 58 | 15% |
Scientists | 32 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
Researcher | 15 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 79 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 13% |
Unknown | 85 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 335. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#100,359
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#35
of 4,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,019
of 441,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.