↓ Skip to main content

Potential micronutrient deficiency lacks recognition in diabetes.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Potential micronutrient deficiency lacks recognition in diabetes.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann F Walker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,969,397
of 19,884,221 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,467
of 3,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,959
of 346,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#80
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,884,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.