↓ Skip to main content

NICE guideline NG193 for chronic pain: reasons to be cheerful

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
NICE guideline NG193 for chronic pain: reasons to be cheerful
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgp21x717425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Stannard, Ian Bernstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#13,802,807
of 21,252,842 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,065
of 4,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,521
of 460,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#69
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,252,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.