↓ Skip to main content

Pulse oximetry in primary care: primary care diagnostic technology update

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Pulse oximetry in primary care: primary care diagnostic technology update
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, May 2011
DOI 10.3399/bjgp11x572553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette Plüddemann, Matthew Thompson, Carl Heneghan, Christopher Price

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Engineering 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 21 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#13,182,607
of 19,862,278 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,043
of 3,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,932
of 347,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#41
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,862,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.