| Title |
The rise in prescribing for anxiety in UK primary care between 2003 and 2018: a population-based cohort study using CPRD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0561 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Archer, Stephanie J MacNeill, Becky Mars, Katrina Turner, David Kessler, Nicola Wiles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 50 | 42% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Armenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 16% |
| Scientists | 14 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 17% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 367. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#87,842
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#31
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,886
of 521,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.