↓ Skip to main content

Centralised pathology services

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Centralised pathology services
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2008
DOI 10.3399/bjgp08x279814
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa R Thurlow, Ian R Bailey, Nicola M Payne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,532,090
of 21,699,130 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,703
of 4,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,477
of 400,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#72
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,699,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.