↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators to primary care research: views of GP trainees and trainers

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to primary care research: views of GP trainees and trainers
Published in
BJGP Open, February 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Stephenson, Eugene Yee Hing Tang, Eugene Tang, Penny Williams, Hilary Allan, John Rouse, Morag Burton, Caroline Wroe, Richard Bellamy, Hannah Hesselgreaves

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unknown 9 82%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,369,040
of 22,307,302 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#73
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,147
of 338,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,307,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them