↓ Skip to main content

The views of GPs about using sit–stand desks: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The views of GPs about using sit–stand desks: an observational study
Published in
BJGP Open, March 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory J H Biddle, Nicholas Thomas, Charlotte L Edwardson, Stacy A Clemes, Amanda J Daley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 25%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,146,656
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#54
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,728
of 437,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.