↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity promotion by GPs: a cross-sectional survey in England

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Physical activity promotion by GPs: a cross-sectional survey in England
Published in
BJGP Open, April 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Lowe, Anna Myers, Helen Quirk, Jamie Blackshaw, Sabrina Palanee, Rob Copeland

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) contributes to the prevention and management of many health conditions. Primary care practitioners have an important role to play in supporting people to be physically active. The study had three aims; 1) to explore general practitioners' (GPs) awareness, and knowledge of the PA guidelines, 2) to assess their confidence in promoting PA, and 3) to explore factors that influence PA promotion amongst GPs. Cross-sectional survey, secondary analysis. UK-based GPs were invited to take part in an online survey in January 2021. Demographic questions were followed by nine multiple choice questions. Categorical data were analysed using descriptive statistics and open-ended data were analysed using content analysis and inductive coding. Eight hundred and nine GPs based in England completed the survey. Most GP respondents (99%) believed that PA is important yet only 36% reported being at least 'somewhat familiar' with current PA guidance. Despite this, 74% of GPs reported feeling confident to raise the topic of PA with their patients. Barriers included lack of time, perceptions of patient attitude and perception of risk, language issues and COVID-19. Key facilitators were identified and 'Couch to 5 k' and the 'parkrun practice' initiative were the most widely used support tools. GPs value PA yet well-known barriers exist in embedding promotion into primary care. As primary care reconfigures there is an opportunity to embed PA into systems, services and processes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,516,082
of 22,617,693 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#84
of 502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,050
of 345,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,617,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.