↓ Skip to main content

Potential impact of NICE guidelines on referrals from primary care to nephrology

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 4,208)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
151 news outlets
twitter
12 tweeters
Title
Potential impact of NICE guidelines on referrals from primary care to nephrology
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0145
Authors

Michael K Sullivan, Bhautesh Dinesh Jani, Elaine Rutherford, Paul Welsh, Alex McConnachie, Rupert Major, David McAllister, Dorothea Nitsch, Frances S Mair, Patrick B Mark, Jennifer S Lees

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#9,873
of 22,130,231 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215
of 189,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,130,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.