| Title |
The oak processionary moth: a new health hazard?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp15x686341 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sibylle Rahlenbeck, Jochen Utikal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 22% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#855,566
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#389
of 4,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,572
of 263,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.