↓ Skip to main content

Complex consultations and the ‘edge of chaos’

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 1970
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Complex consultations and the ‘edge of chaos’
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 1970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D Innes, Peter D Campion, Frances E Griffiths

Abstract

Complexity theory has attracted considerable attention in recent years, both within medicine and in the wider world. Its themes of uncertainty and non-linearity resonate deeply with the experience of working in general practice. Describing the consultation as a complex, adaptive system provides a coherent theoretical basis for understanding the consultation, which has so far been lacking. Understanding the consultation as a complex, adaptive system offers insights into the consultation of that may prove to be of practical use to clinicians.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Postgraduate 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Other 28 30%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 52%
Social Sciences 14 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 6 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,016,535
of 19,862,278 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#518
of 3,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,632
of 206,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,862,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.