| Title |
Embracing uncertainty to advance diagnosis in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x690941 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsti Malterud, Ann Dorrit Guassora, Susanne Reventlow, Annemarie Jutel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 34% |
| Australia | 7 | 6% |
| Norway | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 51% |
| Scientists | 33 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 40% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#517,983
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#209
of 4,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,901
of 318,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.