↓ Skip to main content

A hidden problem: consequences of the misdiagnosis of perinatal obsessive–compulsive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
A hidden problem: consequences of the misdiagnosis of perinatal obsessive–compulsive disorder
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, May 2013
DOI 10.3399/bjgp13x667376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona L Challacombe, Abigail L Wroe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 23%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 47%
Psychology 9 21%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#677,656
of 17,180,396 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#334
of 3,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,743
of 198,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.