@SonaliKinra Around 1 in 100 will be associated with bladder cancer. More if older. But in younger people could also be first sign of renal disease https://t.co/oB2dkZxN77
@ashtroid22 Could work better than FIT if it focuses on symptomatic rather than asymptomatic screening. Asymptomatic: colorectal cancer prevalence 0.1% to 0.3% (varies with age) Haematuria in primary care: 2.8% prevalence (age >60) Haematuria self-r
Non-visible versus visible haematuria and bladder cancer risk: a study of electronic records in primary care https://t.co/dqHxE1Ok24 #bladdercancer https://t.co/jLE9U9AhHi
Non-visible versus visible haematuria and bladder cancer risk: a study of electronic records in primary care https://t.co/dqHxE1Ok24 #bladdercancer #yellowhelps https://t.co/eTTW0tDwza
RT @BURSTurology: NICE: Dysuria (GP registry study, no data on LUTS) https://t.co/Yz2TFrvHof AUA: Irritative (no evidence). Poll: any sympt…
RT @BURSTurology: NICE: Dysuria (GP registry study, no data on LUTS) https://t.co/Yz2TFrvHof AUA: Irritative (no evidence). Poll: any sympt…
RT @BURSTurology: NICE: Dysuria (GP registry study, no data on LUTS) https://t.co/Yz2TFrvHof AUA: Irritative (no evidence). Poll: any sympt…
NICE: Dysuria (GP registry study, no data on LUTS) https://t.co/Yz2TFrvHof AUA: Irritative (no evidence). Poll: any symptoms (due to lack of evidence?). Need to be young and "very" asymptomatic to avoid cancer Ix in NVH currently. Any thoughts on how to se
RT @drtanws: @PelvicERAS @BAUSurology @BURSTurology @m_e_nielsen @veerukasi @mrSinanK @JoCresswell4 @benchallacombe -personally dont think…
Non-visible & visible #Hematuria associated w/ #BladderCancer risk, visible form confers nearly 2x the risk http://t.co/NAJ7nx9icR
Non-visible versus visible haematuria and bladder cancer risk: a study of electronic records in primary care –... http://t.co/uyEFch9VsK
Don't ignore non-vis haematuria: 1/2 as likely as vis haem to be due to ca @BJGPjournal http://t.co/fnJ8QnxWT2 @BladderCancerUK @TUF_tweets
Don't ignore non-vis haematuria: 1/2 as likely as vis haem to be due to ca @BJGPjournal http://t.co/fnJ8QnxWT2 @BladderCancerUK @TUF_tweets
Don't ignore non-vis haematuria: 1/2 as likely as vis haem to be due to ca @BJGPjournal http://t.co/fnJ8QnxWT2 @BladderCancerUK @TUF_tweets
Don't ignore non-vis haematuria: 1/2 as likely as vis haem to be due to ca @BJGPjournal http://t.co/fnJ8QnxWT2 @BladderCancerUK @TUF_tweets
Don't ignore non-vis haematuria: 1/2 as likely as vis haem to be due to ca @BJGPjournal http://t.co/fnJ8QnxWT2 @BladderCancerUK @TUF_tweets
The predictive value for bladder cancer of non-visible versus visible haematuria is not dissimilar http://t.co/biIVjNgkuA
submitted by phlogiston555 to science [link] [comment] http://t.co/Sy6tdnXiyu via @reddit
Non-visible & visible #Hematuria associated w/ #BladderCancer - visible form confers nearly twice the risk http://t.co/f6cB39NRwp
Non-visible versus visible haematuria and bladder cancer risk: a study of electronic records in primary care. http://t.co/BqRsHFySmN
Visible #haematuria confers nearly twice the risk of bladder cancer compared with non-visible haematuria http://t.co/A8u1r51ray #cancer