↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features of patients with non-metastatic lung cancer in primary care: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 111)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Clinical features of patients with non-metastatic lung cancer in primary care: a case-control study
Published in
BJGP Open, February 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101397
Authors

Marcela Ewing, Peter Naredi, Chenyang Zhang, Lars Lindsköld, Jörgen Månsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#384,276
of 12,236,619 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#7
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,419
of 327,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,236,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.