↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features of patients with non-metastatic lung cancer in primary care: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Clinical features of patients with non-metastatic lung cancer in primary care: a case-control study
Published in
BJGP Open, February 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101397
Authors

Marcela Ewing, Peter Naredi, Chenyang Zhang, Lars Lindsköld, Jörgen Månsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2018.
All research outputs
#336,908
of 11,026,397 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#4
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,386
of 272,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,026,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.