| Title |
Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x695057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Mordecai, Carl Reynolds, Liam J Donaldson, Amanda C de C Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 38 | 48% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 19% |
| Scientists | 15 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2021.
All research outputs
#206,717
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#73
of 4,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,985
of 456,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.