| Title |
An evidence-based first consultation for depression: nine key messages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x695681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce Arroll, Weng Yee Chin, Fiona Moir, Christopher Dowrick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 29% |
| Scientists | 19 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#866,082
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#380
of 4,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,469
of 344,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#10
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.