↓ Skip to main content

Access to primary care affects the health of Deaf people

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Access to primary care affects the health of Deaf people
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2015
DOI 10.3399/bjgp15x683629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Emond, Matthew Ridd, Hilary Sutherland, Lorna Allsop, Andrew Alexander, Jim Kyle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 20%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Psychology 9 14%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Linguistics 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#285,275
of 18,659,856 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#108
of 3,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,662
of 306,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,659,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.