↓ Skip to main content

Shared decision-making (SHARE-D) for healthy behaviour change: a feasibility study in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Shared decision-making (SHARE-D) for healthy behaviour change: a feasibility study in general practice
Published in
BJGP Open, April 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101517
Authors

Margaret E Cupples, Judith A Cole, Nigel D Hart, Neil Heron, Michelle C McKinley, Mark A Tully

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,040,239
of 11,197,915 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#28
of 85 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,599
of 208,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,197,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.