"Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience" https://t.co/uF5IRZACDK
RT @mellojonny: Is the science and genetics of inequality: exciting and well funded, sidelining the politics of inequality? https://t.co/9b…
RT @BJGPjournal: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience – an interdisciplinary text in two part…
RT @mellojonny: Is the science and genetics of inequality: exciting and well funded, sidelining the politics of inequality? https://t.co/9b…
Is the science and genetics of inequality: exciting and well funded, sidelining the politics of inequality? https://t.co/9bFKPwRoxy book review by @trishgreenhalgh
RT @BJGPjournal: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience – an interdisciplinary text in two part…
RT @BJGPjournal: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience – an interdisciplinary text in two part…
Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience – an interdisciplinary text in two parts: ‘Getting to gripswith the thought styles’ and ‘Fixing real people’ https://t.co/jxd72v3kDA https://t.co/6U4ptwM2Uk
RT @Andy_Bilson: An important contribution to challenging current use of 'science" https://t.co/bqZ1QiHUQq
An important contribution to challenging current use of 'science" https://t.co/bqZ1QiHUQq
RT @AMLTaylor66: Wastell and White ‘… to produce findings which seem to transfer so convincingly from the laboratory cage to the disadvanta…
That neuroscientists can believe the guff you expose boggles my mind which has obviously been damaged by socio pathological issues. Kudos Sue and Dave https://t.co/03hWch950b
RT @AMLTaylor66: Wassall and White ‘… to produce findings which seem to transfer so convincingly from the laboratory cage to the disadvanta…
RT @AMLTaylor66: Wassall and White ‘… to produce findings which seem to transfer so convincingly from the laboratory cage to the disadvanta…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
Wastell and White ‘… to produce findings which seem to transfer so convincingly from the laboratory cage to the disadvantaged housing estate’ #SocialWork #ACEs For more click here 👉 https://t.co/GsNqoq1wtT… https://t.co/R96aP8p7iJ
RT @AMLTaylor66: Wassall and White ‘… to produce findings which seem to transfer so convincingly from the laboratory cage to the disadvanta…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
Wassall and White ‘… to produce findings which seem to transfer so convincingly from the laboratory cage to the disadvantaged housing estate’ #SocialWork #ACEs For more click here 👉 https://t.co/fnLcyssp0e https://t.co/R96aP8p7iJ
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
Good review. Book sounds tremendous, an important critique of the epigenetics gravy train. I'm reading David Bohm about assumptions behind science at the moment, opening my mind to the fragmentation implicit in assumptions based on out of date metaphors li
Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of #Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/wtEzZ1sKFo
Books: Blinded by Science: The Social Implications of Epigenetics and Neuroscience https://t.co/SI4W2bFNyW thanks very much @trishgreenhalgh I was told a mother would prevent brain damage to her infant by perfect parenting. Based on one study of 24 infants