↓ Skip to main content

How chronic diseases thrive

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
80 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
How chronic diseases thrive
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x698237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Senior

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2018.
All research outputs
#280,708
of 12,403,723 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#123
of 2,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,973
of 270,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,403,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.