↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the general practice pharmacist’s role in England: a longitudinal study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
89 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of the general practice pharmacist’s role in England: a longitudinal study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x698849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fay Bradley, Elizabeth Seston, Ceinwen Mannall, Chris Cutts

Abstract

To address the growing GP workforce crisis, NHS England (NHSE) launched the Clinical Pharmacists in General Practice scheme in 2015. The NHSE scheme promotes a newer, patient-facing role for pharmacists and, currently, there is little insight into the role and activities undertaken. All scheme pharmacists are enrolled on the general practice pharmacist training pathway (GPPTP). To investigate the role evolution and integration of clinical pharmacists in general practice in England. Longitudinal survey of all phase 1 GPPTP registrants working in general practice at start of (T1) and 6 months into (T2) training. An online longitudinal survey was administered to all phase 1 GPPTP registrants (n = 457) at T1 and T2, measuring their perceived knowledge, skill, and confidence, activities performed, and perceptions of practice integration, environment, and support. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were conducted. Response rates were 46% (T1) and 52% (T2); 158 participants completed both questionnaires. Perceived knowledge, skill, and confidence levels increased significantly from T1 to T2 for all areas, except for managing acute or common illness. Scope of practice increased significantly, particularly in patient-facing activities. Sharing office space with administrative staff was common and 13% of participants reported having no designated work area. Perceived integration at T2 was fairly high (median = 5 on a scale of 1-7) but GP clinical support was 'too little' according to one-third of participants. Findings show not only patient-facing role expansion, but also practice environment and support issues. Pharmacists may appreciate more GP time invested in their development. Practices need to be realistic about this support and not expect an immediate reduction in workload.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2022.
All research outputs
#565,299
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#234
of 4,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,300
of 340,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.