↓ Skip to main content

Addressing the needs of patients with medically unexplained symptoms: 10 key messages

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
87 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Addressing the needs of patients with medically unexplained symptoms: 10 key messages
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, August 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x698813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim C Olde Hartman, Cindy LK Lam, Jinan Usta, David Clarke, Sandra Fortes, Christopher Dowrick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#272,725
of 12,520,210 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#122
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,091
of 268,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,520,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.