Los estudios no encuentran ningún tratamiento con una mejora clínicamente relevante frente a placebo. Sí hay diferencias estadísticamente significativas, pero el máximo beneficio era de 0.6 puntos sobre 6 en una escala subjetiva (fluticasona inhalada). ht
@Van_Doge @MgRadegonde @Tenamac2 @dirtybiology https://t.co/8GHhhYaXkS Article : https://t.co/VmyWVu9aOz Ils parlent des "remèdes" contre la toux
RT @BJGPjournal: No. 5 – Sub-acute cough treatments – This systematic review found no compelling evidence for the efficacy of any drug trea…
RT @CizCG: do consider submitting for RCGP RPY .@rcgp https://t.co/oFYIJCDhRW
do consider submitting for RCGP RPY .@rcgp
RT @BJGPjournal: No. 5 – Sub-acute cough treatments – This systematic review found no compelling evidence for the efficacy of any drug trea…
No. 5 – Sub-acute cough treatments – This systematic review found no compelling evidence for the efficacy of any drug treatments for cough persisting after a respiratory infection @LGHemkens https://t.co/EJOtQJB007 https://t.co/Z6mc9lkZ09
@VPplenarysesh Not sure-you would really say a statement like „Evidence on treatment options for subacute cough is weak. There is no treatment showing clear patient-relevant benefits in clinical trials.“ would not be useful in a primary care guideline? htt
RT @DMGParisV: #LectureDeLaSemaine Quelle est l'efficacité des traitements des toux chroniques? via British Journal of General Practice @B…
#LectureDeLaSemaine Quelle est l'efficacité des traitements des toux chroniques? via British Journal of General Practice @BJGPjournal https://t.co/2F8Lk5rxIa https://t.co/2F8Lk5rxIa
RT @BJGPjournal: There is no compelling evidence to treat cough which persists after a respiratory infection with drugs, including budesoni…
(Br J Gen Pract) Ninguna opción terapéutica con beneficio claro en la #tos prolongada (3-8 semanas) tras infección viral https://t.co/MflRxcQTu7
RT @Vannyamoto: Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials. - PubMed…
Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials. - PubMed - NCBI 亜急性咳嗽は経過観察が良さそう ただし検討研究が少ない https://t.co/ZaeA1qmnCI
Pillen en pufjes weinig effectief bij hardnekkige hoest (vind ik persoonlijk duidelijker dan subacute hoest..)
There is no compelling evidence to treat cough which persists after a respiratory infection with drugs, including budesonide, fluticasone, salbutamol plus ipratropium, and montelukast https://t.co/86y6Depk5u
RT @WingateMedical: Had a cold? Got a cough? Latest evidence suggests all remedies including inhalers are ineffective. https://t.co/fVP9Ce0…
Had a cold? Got a cough? Latest evidence suggests all remedies including inhalers are ineffective. https://t.co/fVP9Ce0c3u
“No treatment option was associated with a clear benefit on cough recovery ” / “e694” https://t.co/keq8cWh1Nv
RT @hiroshiiga: Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials https://t.…
Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials https://t.co/3AcT2h1InR
#ETUDESANTEDUSOIR Les antitussifs communs n’apportent pas plus de soulagement qu’un #placebo, ne permettent pas d’accélérer la guérison et peuvent générer des effets secondaires non graves mais désagréables (méta-analyse) @BJGPjournal https://t.co/OgyvbYBv
RT @BJGPjournal: The @BJGPjournal article is free here: https://t.co/DBoNI6DY8Z https://t.co/thUorl8m3q
RT @kojima_aponet: 【Br J Gen Pract】 Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinic…
【Br J Gen Pract】 Treatments for subacute cough in primary care: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials https://t.co/UKoqj9BG7K
RT @BJGPjournal: The @BJGPjournal article is free here: https://t.co/DBoNI6DY8Z https://t.co/thUorl8m3q
The @BJGPjournal article is free here: https://t.co/DBoNI6DY8Z