↓ Skip to main content

Steam inhalation therapy: severe scalds as an adverse side effect

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Steam inhalation therapy: severe scalds as an adverse side effect
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2012
DOI 10.3399/bjgp12x652337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Baartmans, Evelien Kerkhof, Jos Vloemans, Jan Dokter, Susanne Nijman, Dick Tibboel, Marianne Nieuwenhuis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 17%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#213,281
of 17,956,456 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#78
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,130
of 285,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,956,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.