↓ Skip to main content

Why patients and doctors should watch Inside Out

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Why patients and doctors should watch Inside Out
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x683653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Bryant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,169,048
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,688
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,967
of 407,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#36
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.