↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of indications for tonsillectomy and frequency of evidence-based surgery: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of primary care electronic records

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 4,926)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
35 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Incidence of indications for tonsillectomy and frequency of evidence-based surgery: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of primary care electronic records
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, November 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x699833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana Šumilo, Linda Nichols, Ronan Ryan, Tom Marshall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Other 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 59 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Unspecified 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 63 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 247. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#152,817
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#50
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,975
of 365,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.