↓ Skip to main content

Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 3,621)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
359 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x700241
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Travers, Roman Romero-Ortuno, Jade Bailey, Marie-Therese Cooney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 359 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 38 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Sports and Recreations 13 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 41 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 361. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#46,264
of 17,121,505 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#20
of 3,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,593
of 396,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,121,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.