↓ Skip to main content

Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and resource implications: the NVP Impact Study

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and resource implications: the NVP Impact Study
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x700745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger Gadsby, Verity Rawson, Edward Dziadulewicz, Ben Rousseau, Hannah Collings

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#225,394
of 12,342,181 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#97
of 2,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,518
of 176,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.