↓ Skip to main content

Incentive schemes to increase dementia diagnoses in primary care in England: a retrospective cohort study of unintended consequences

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Incentive schemes to increase dementia diagnoses in primary care in England: a retrospective cohort study of unintended consequences
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Liu, Emily Green, Panagiotis Kasteridis, Maria Goddard, Rowena Jacobs, Raphael Wittenberg, Anne Mason

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%
Computer Science 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#315,543
of 14,509,999 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#147
of 3,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,116
of 264,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,509,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.