↓ Skip to main content

Sex differences in fitness to practise test scores: a cohort study of GPs

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Sex differences in fitness to practise test scores: a cohort study of GPs
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701789
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Unwin, Katherine Woolf, Jane Dacre, Henry Ww Potts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,455,714
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#739
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,118
of 353,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#24
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.