↓ Skip to main content

Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Walter, Clarissa Penfold, Alexis Joannides, Smiji Saji, Margaret Johnson, Colin Watts, Andrew Brodbelt, Michael D Jenkinson, Stephen J Price, Willie Hamilton, Suzanne E Scott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 21 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#492,325
of 21,401,022 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#215
of 4,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,733
of 285,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#10
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,401,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.