↓ Skip to main content

Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Walter, Clarissa Penfold, Alexis Joannides, Smiji Saji, Margaret Johnson, Colin Watts, Andrew Brodbelt, Michael D Jenkinson, Stephen J Price, Willie Hamilton, Suzanne E Scott

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 35 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 6 7%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 37 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#528,255
of 25,380,089 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#219
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,905
of 358,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#11
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.