↓ Skip to main content

Facilitated group work for people with long-term conditions: a systematic review of benefits from studies of group-work interventions

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Facilitated group work for people with long-term conditions: a systematic review of benefits from studies of group-work interventions
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x702233
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret Jackson, Daniel Jones, Judith Dyson, Una Macleod

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Psychology 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,002,545
of 13,396,110 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#526
of 2,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,059
of 255,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#29
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.