@7juXxsnL @drraja_ Here's the reference.https://t.co/bXwe2pcJXj And https://t.co/DbmyQ3ZdJO
@ALNEMERK يمكن تشخيص حوالي 80% من الأمراض عن طريق التاريخ المرضي المفصل! المصدر: https://t.co/HRDdw6E3AY
@dr_lungs @NabilahMayat @MsRobinHosking @GeriSoc There is evidence that the history alone can be diagnostic in some 80% of cases (good old Pareto principle!)... ...not to mention the problem of 'incidentalomas' in indiscriminate scanning! [ref: https://t
@JakeVeigelMD Although, to play devils advocate, if some studies indicate up to 83% of medical diagnoses are made by history alone, mightn’t physical exams be a waste of time in many cases? https://t.co/rRSPqYIyFb
Some have asked for sources. Here’s one... https://t.co/ru69EPWdvU Here’s another https://t.co/K1rRxpyu4e
Return to Basics. https://t.co/CP7znvEfwg
https://t.co/JgASPL74PK 'investigations are diagnostically more useful and will have a much greater impact on decision making if the input from the medical history can be maximised’ This should be on every visible surface everywhere!
Otra lección, ¡La anamnesis es rey! Dado que la tinción era tanto de heces como orina y el paciente relató consumir zumo ayer, tenía una sólida sospecha clínica pre-prueba Esto permitío ahorrar pruebas con potencial iatrógeno (e.g radiografía de ábdomen)