↓ Skip to main content

GPs’ and practice staff’s views of a telephone first approach to demand management: a qualitative study in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
GPs’ and practice staff’s views of a telephone first approach to demand management: a qualitative study in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x702401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Newbould, Josephine Exley, Sarah Ball, Jennie Corbett, Emma Pitchforth, Martin Roland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 25 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Unspecified 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,670,870
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#818
of 4,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,958
of 363,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#23
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.