↓ Skip to main content

GPs’ and practice staff’s views of a telephone first approach to demand management: a qualitative study in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
GPs’ and practice staff’s views of a telephone first approach to demand management: a qualitative study in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x702401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Newbould, Josephine Exley, Sarah Ball, Jennie Corbett, Emma Pitchforth, Martin Roland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 60%
Student > Postgraduate 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 100%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,057,198
of 13,640,418 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#563
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,648
of 255,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#29
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,418 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.