↓ Skip to main content

General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x702425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethany F Anthony, Alun Surgey, Julia Hiscock, Nefyn H Williams, Joanna M Charles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Other 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#530,751
of 13,458,925 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#279
of 2,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,018
of 254,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,458,925 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.