| Title |
General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x702425 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bethany F Anthony, Alun Surgey, Julia Hiscock, Nefyn H Williams, Joanna M Charles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 58% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 53% |
| Scientists | 13 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,015,796
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#446
of 4,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,806
of 363,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.