“suggesting that financial benefits bc of ⬇️units costs may be outweighed by ⬆️volume & hence employing allied health professionals to perform roles normally completed by GPs may prove more costly overall, limits impact of skill mix to healthcare cost”
Task shifting, principles of economic evaluation, and decision making https://t.co/sUpZoSCyTI @BJGPjournal #taskshifting
General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care. https://t.co/7M7x7WpjvJ
RT @NefynWilliams: minor illness clinics run by nurses are cost-effective; other role substitution services need more evidence https://t.co…
RT @BJGPjournal An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in primary care https://t.co/rqfkXUXHC1 https://t.co/N1e3oTEdAL
RT @RCNGPNForum: A small study evaluating previously published research, not necessarily applicable to current U.K. GP setting. Research i…
A small study evaluating previously published research, not necessarily applicable to current U.K. GP setting. Research is often instigated by medics & continues to focus on a primary care based medical model. New research is needed robust evaluation.
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
Bad stock photo! This is louise, we went to school together. She is lovely, and a model. Why do publications not find better real pics 🙄
States no evidence was found for AHP, let’s get the research out there #FCPHYSIO
RT @NefynWilliams: minor illness clinics run by nurses are cost-effective; other role substitution services need more evidence https://t.co…
RT @NefynWilliams: minor illness clinics run by nurses are cost-effective; other role substitution services need more evidence https://t.co…
minor illness clinics run by nurses are cost-effective; other role substitution services need more evidence
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @Mary__McCarthy: Cheaper alternatives to GPs are not cost effective. General Practice is the robust base of any health care system https…
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @Mary__McCarthy: Cheaper alternatives to GPs are not cost effective. General Practice is the robust base of any health care system https…
Cheaper alternatives to GPs are not cost effective. General Practice is the robust base of any health care system
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
Really important piece @odo_kate especially in view of current policies in #UK #Scotland @DrGregorSmith #primarycare #GP
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @yasukif: General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in prim…
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
RT @khcheck: This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues https://t.co/Z8hlSwwzHx
General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care https://t.co/7nR85ub9Xv
This is really important, as role substitution is suggested as a solution to current workforce issues
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
RT @DrP_Manc: ‘There is limited economic evidence for role substitution in primary care’ Recent systematic review in @BJGPjournal suppor…
‘There is limited economic evidence for role substitution in primary care’ Recent systematic review in @BJGPjournal supporting previous research findings that non-medical roles in #generalpractice are not cost-saving https://t.co/HSONynaPaW
RT @BJGPjournal: An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in pri…
An international systematic review found little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of non-medical role substitution in primary care https://t.co/iS7SyMDZPf https://t.co/zyY3oHl2h6
RT @PRIMECentre: New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: genera…
RT @PRIMECentre: New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: genera…
RT @PRIMECentre: New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: genera…
RT @PRIMECentre: New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: genera…
RT @PRIMECentre: New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: genera…
RT @PRIMECentre: New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: genera…
New publication: Anthony B, Surgey A, Hiscock J, Williams NH, Charles J. Systematic review of economic evaluations: general medical services by non-medical health professionals. Br J Gen Pract 2019; 69 (682): e304-e313. DOI: https://t.co/bG1HuBV4cI @PRIMEC
General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care. https://t.co/FTLECAnRzd