↓ Skip to main content

Should GPs routinely screen for gambling disorders?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Should GPs routinely screen for gambling disorders?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x702329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Roberts, Henrietta Bowden-Jones, David Roberts, Stephen Sharman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 60%
Unspecified 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Psychology 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#693,647
of 13,572,020 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#368
of 2,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,932
of 255,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,572,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.