↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
48 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
366 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
616 Mendeley
Title
Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eddie Donaghy, Helen Atherton, Victoria Hammersley, Hannah McNeilly, Annemieke Bikker, Lucy Robbins, John Campbell, Brian McKinstry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 616 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 616 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 14%
Student > Bachelor 69 11%
Researcher 46 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 6%
Other 36 6%
Other 103 17%
Unknown 237 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 11%
Social Sciences 25 4%
Psychology 24 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 3%
Other 77 13%
Unknown 253 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#374,334
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#147
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,045
of 356,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.