↓ Skip to main content

Detecting heart valve disease: can we do better?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Detecting heart valve disease: can we do better?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x684181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Draper, John Chambers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,616,038
of 13,343,384 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#772
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,423
of 265,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,343,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.