| Title |
The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) quality improvement initiative using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data: Lessons learned
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x703697 |
| Authors |
Helen Booth, Eleanor Yelland, David Mullett, Arlene Gallagher, Shivani Padmanabhan, Stephen Welburn, Janet Valentine, Puja Myles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,254,879
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,658
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,196
of 352,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#48
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.