↓ Skip to main content

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) quality improvement initiative using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data: Lessons learned

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
Title
The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) quality improvement initiative using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data: Lessons learned
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x703697
Authors

Helen Booth, Eleanor Yelland, David Mullett, Arlene Gallagher, Shivani Padmanabhan, Stephen Welburn, Janet Valentine, Puja Myles

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,185,386
of 13,472,087 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#928
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,904
of 249,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#35
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,472,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.