↓ Skip to main content

Added value and cascade effects of inflammatory marker tests in UK primary care: a cohort study from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
68 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Added value and cascade effects of inflammatory marker tests in UK primary care: a cohort study from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704321
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Watson, Chris Salisbury, Penny Whiting, Jonathan Banks, Yvette Pyne, Willie Hamilton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#419,909
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#167
of 4,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,868
of 367,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#9
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.