↓ Skip to main content

Research evidence is essential for the development of family medicine as a discipline in the Japanese healthcare system

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Research evidence is essential for the development of family medicine as a discipline in the Japanese healthcare system
Published in
BJGP Open, June 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen19x101650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Kaneko, Ai Oishi, Yoshinori Matsui, Junichiro Miyachi, Takuya Aoki, Maria Mathews

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 63%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,275,753
of 14,039,431 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#72
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,380
of 255,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,039,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them