↓ Skip to main content

Quality improvement of prescribing safety: a pilot study in primary care using UK electronic health records

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Quality improvement of prescribing safety: a pilot study in primary care using UK electronic health records
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen P Booth, Arlene M Gallagher, David Mullett, Lucy Carty, Shivani Padmanabhan, Puja R Myles, Stephen J Welburn, Matthew Hoghton, Imran Rafi, Janet Valentine

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Unspecified 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,216,430
of 13,549,568 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#621
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,489
of 248,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#28
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,549,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.