↓ Skip to main content

Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Gilbert, Victoria Allgar, Tim Doran

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,187,603
of 13,500,585 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#607
of 2,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,076
of 193,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#21
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,500,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.