| Title |
Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x704645 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Gilbert, Victoria Allgar, Tim Doran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,763,817
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,265
of 4,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,722
of 349,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#36
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.