↓ Skip to main content

Paediatric asthma care in the UK: fragmented and fatally fallible

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Paediatric asthma care in the UK: fragmented and fatally fallible
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x704933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark L Levy, Louise Fleming, John O Warner, Andrew Bush

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,119,901
of 24,662,675 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#514
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,295
of 351,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#19
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,662,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.